![]() ![]() Anyone with inclinations towards remixing or playing with digital files had their go at "sound biting" the life out of multiple hits. What may be being sorely missed is how diluted and overexposed The Doors catalog got when someone threw open the gates on it to make a quick buck. Hoffman has a long record of making outlandish claims that later he either contradicts or are proven to be untrue. The 2 track mixdowns were liscensed out to DCC and to Analogue Productions.for CDs, and SACDs/ LPs. ![]() He was asked about this and claimed no one ever touched those tapes but him. He also claimed to have remixed several Beatle live releases, then later claimed to have just "heard" the master tape.īruce Botnick would NEVER EVER allow the multitracks out of his sights. I promise you Hoffman NEVER EVER "remixed" the first Doors album. Steve said he preferred a version not his own, but no censoring was evident.yet you said "any comment stating a preference for a different version is censored ". (I assume you are familiar with the term "bites".)Īnd for your thought experiment was a failure. But to help you, Steve Hoffman is saying even though he remixed the first Doors album, "several times", Steve's work "bites" in comparison with the original. (and note to several albums are referenced in the thread, but the post I linked is only about the first Doors album) Aren't "objectivists" supposed to be able to apply logic? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |